In re Bay Area Material Handling, Inc.

76 F.3d 384 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re BAY AREA MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., Debtor. BAY AREA MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., Debtor-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; Yale Materials Handling Corporation, Trustees-Appellees. No. 94-15815. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 1995. Decided Jan. 25, 1996. 1 Before: FERGUSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN * Chief District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Debtor Bay Area Material Handling, Inc. appeals the order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Conti, J.) affirming the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (Jellen, J.) to convert Bay Area's bankruptcy case from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7. Bay Area contends, first, that the bankruptcy court's factual findings were clearly erroneous; second, that the bankruptcy court improperly admitted evidence of Bay Area's settlement…