In re Day

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Mary K. DAY, Debtor. Mary K. DAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEMAR INSURANCE CORPORATION OF AMERICA; Hemar Service Corporation of America; Higher Education Assistance Foundation; Student & Loan Marketing of America (Sallie Mae); California Student Aid Commission; University of San Francisco; United States Secretary of Education; State Bar of California; Candace Shirley; Richard Abbey; Belden, Abbey, Weitzenber & Kelly; Gary Palm; Christine MacMurray; Workload, Inc.; Margaret DeBrown; Pacific Telesis Group, Inc.; Kenneth Day, Nancy Day, Layne Adams, Byron Adams, and Henry Cano, as individuals and d/b/a a partnership; Ashley Johnson; Regan Holding Corp., Inc.; Christina Martinovich; and Does 1-1000, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15814. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM **…