Juan Jose Castaneda v. Los Angeles County Sherman Block William Y. Thompson Philip Geisler James Roush Robert Schmidt, Juan Jose Castaneda v. Los Angeles County Sherman T. Block, Sheriff, and Unnamed L.A. County Deputy Sheriffs

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Juan Jose CASTANEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; Sherman Block; William Y. Thompson; Philip Geisler; James Roush; Robert Schmidt, Defendants-Appellees. Juan Jose CASTANEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; Sherman T. Block, Sheriff, and unnamed L.A. County Deputy Sheriffs, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-55721, 94-55898. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1995. Decided Feb. 5, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, BURNS * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Juan Jose Castaneda appeals the district court's entry of judgment in favor of defendant Los Angeles county and individual defendants. We affirm. I. 4 Castaneda argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion for a continuance on the first day of trial. This court reviews the denial of a motion for continuance for abuse of discretion. United States v. Real…