Catchings v. City and County of San Francisco

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Letty CATCHINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Clare Murphy, individually and as General Manager of San Francisco City and County Employees' Retirement System; Louis H Renne, Dan Maguire, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16699. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1996. Decided Jan. 26, 1996. Before: ALDISERT * , SCHROEDER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Letty Catchings appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the City and County of San Francisco ("City") on claims filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law alleging that the City violated her due process rights by denying her certain pension benefits to which she claims entitlement through her deceased husband, a former employee of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. We affirm the district court and draw generously from its order. I. 3 Harry Catchings,…