Ronald Paul Clark v. Tana Wood P. O'COnnOr D.L. Peterson

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Paul CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD; P. O'Connor; D.L. Peterson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Paul Clark, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison officials. Clark alleged that he was deprived of personal property without due process. The district court dismissed Clark's complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the ground that Clark had an adequate postdeprivation remedy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal of an action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert.…