Columbia River United v. Dowdle

Good Law
76 F.3d 385·1996 WL 30292·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199694-35242California265 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. COLUMBIA RIVER UNITED, a Washington nonprofit corporation on its own behalf and on behalf of its members; Lois Camp, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated individuals; Robert Todd, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated individuals; Julie Meyer, individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Walter DOWDLE, in his capacity as Administrator of the Agency of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an agency of the United States; Agency of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, an agency of the United States, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35242. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We affirm the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to this court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.