Federal Trade Commission v. Tiny Doubles International, Inc. And American Mobile Phone Systems, Inc., and Morris Samuel Friedman

76 F.3d 385 1996-1 Trade Cases P 71,297 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TINY DOUBLES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and American Mobile Phone Systems, Inc., Defendants, and Morris Samuel Friedman, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-15752. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. * Decided Jan. 18, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, ** Senior District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Morris Samuel Friedman appeals pro se the district court's (1) order granting in part the plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC") motion for summary judgment, holding that Friedman violated the FTC's Franchise Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 436; (2) denial of his cross motion for summary judgment; (3) entry of a permanent injunction; and (4) entry of a judgment for $798,065.26 for consumer redress. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 4 A grant of summary judgment is…