Javier Carrasco v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

76 F.3d 385 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Javier CARRASCO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. Decided Jan. 24, 1996. 1 Before: HALL, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Javier Carrasco seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") final order of deportation rendered on August 31, 1994. In his petition, Carrasco argues: (1) that he is eligible for 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c) (Section 212(c)) discretionary relief; (2) that INS' Notice of Appeal form violates due process; and (3) that a stay pending the outcome of his appeal should be granted. Because we do not have jurisdiction over the first claim and find the last two without merit, we deny the petition. I. Exhaustion of Remedies 4 In general, we have jurisdiction to review the BIA's final orders of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C.…