Flynn v. Ballinger

Good Law
76 F.3d 386·1996 WL 19186·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7166
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 199694-15907California199 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 386 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2759 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward J. FLYNN, II, individually and on behalf of the Edward J. Flynn, II Individual Retirement Account and Edwin L. Griffith, Jr., individually and on behalf of the Edwin L. Griffith Jr. Individual Retirement Account, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Douglas G. BALLINGER, Byron Geils, Ronald L. Hagenbaugh, Michael J. John, Edward C. Roualdes, William S. Swindells, and the Pacific Lithograph Company, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Defendants/Appellees. No. 94-15907. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Jan. 18, 1996. Before: NORRIS, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its order granting defendants' motion to dismiss (filed May 9, 1994). 3 AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.