Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. v. Eddie Ylst, Warden

Good Law
76 F.3d 386·1996 WL 19244·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7169
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 199694-55770California396 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond D. JACKSON, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55770. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Raymond D. Jackson appeals pro se the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Jackson contends that (1) his counsel was ineffective because he failed to advance all defenses relating to Jackson's impotency, (2) he was physically incompetent during his trial because of his ongoing dialysis treatments, (3) his due process rights were violated during his trial by jury misconduct and (4) his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these issues on appeal. 1 3 We review de novo the denial of a habeas petition. Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994). The district court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.