Hosier v. Baily

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald R. HOSIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas B. BAILY, Alaska Attorney General; Mark Ells, Alaska District Attorney; Allan Hooper, Alaska District Attorney; Thomas M. Jahnke, Alaska Superior Court Judge; Thomas M. Schulz, Alaska State Court Judge; Cynthia M. Hora, Assistant to Alaska Attorney General; Steven West, Attorney; Michael A. Thompson, Attorney Office of Alaska Public Advocate Office; James L. Bruce, Attorney; Harry Branson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35819. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald R. Hosier appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in Hosier's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Hosier alleged that state court judges, prosecutors, and defense counsel conspired to violate Hosier's civil rights during his state criminal…