Richard L. Gastineau v. Home Depot Usa, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Beth Burzloff, a Single Woman

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard L. GASTINEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC., an Ohio corporation, Beth Burzloff, a single woman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16831. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 18, 1996. Before: LAY, ** CHOY, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Richard Gastineau appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Home Depot USA, Inc. and Beth Burzloff. He claims breach of contract, intentional interference with contract, and sexual harassment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 In October 1988, Gastineau began working as a temporary laborer at a Home Depot store in Tucson, Arizona. Approximately three weeks later, he was hired as a full-time salesman. At that time, he signed two forms--an employment application and an Acknowledgment Form--that defined his status as an at-will…