Robert Alan Grote v. Sam Lewis, Director of Arizona Prisons Food Service of America

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Alan GROTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam LEWIS, Director of Arizona Prisons; Food Service of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16755. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert A. Grote, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants failed to provide a diet in accordance with Grote's religious beliefs in violation of Grote's First Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Rise v. Oregon, 59 F.3d 1556, 1558 (9th Cir.1995). 4 Grote contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Lewis. This contention lacks…