Golden Gate Hotel Ass'n v. City and County of San Francisco

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., Randall M. Shaw; Bradford Paul; North of Market Planning Coalition, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Submission Deferred Nov. 14, 1995. Resubmitted Nov. 27, 1995. Decided Jan. 23, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, * District Court Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiff-Appellant Golden Gate Hotel Association ("GGHA") appeals the district court's dismissal, on statute of limitations grounds, of its 42 U.S.C. § 1983 facial challenge to the constitutionality of San Francisco's Residential Hotel Unit Conversion and Demolition Ordinance ("Ordinance"). San Francisco Admin.Code §§ 41.1-41.22. This is the second time the case has been before this court. In the earlier appeal, we reversed the injunction…