James Daniel Garis v. Conmat Engineering, Ltd., a Canadian Corporation Ensteel, a Canadian Corporation

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Daniel GARIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONMAT ENGINEERING, LTD., a Canadian corporation; Ensteel, a Canadian corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15925. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Jan. 30, 1996. Before: NORRIS, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff James Daniel Garis appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict for defendants Ensteel and Conmat Engineering, Ltd., Canadian corporations, in this products liability case. Garis appeals the district court's refusal to give three proposed jury instructions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * On October 3, 1990, Garis severely injured his left arm when it was drawn into the head pulley area of a rock screening plant. Garis filed suit claiming that Conmat, the designer of the rock screening plant, and Ensteel, the…