Ann Hanson v. Heckler Manufacturing and Investment Group, Inc., and Barbara Shindler

76 F.3d 386 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ann HANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HECKLER MANUFACTURING AND INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., and Barbara Shindler, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15322. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 24, 1996. Before: LAY, ** CHOY, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER *** 2 Ann Hanson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment against her claims of (1) discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), (2) breach of an implied-in-fact employment agreement, and (3) negligence, misrepresentation, and interference with business relations. Additionally, Hanson argues that the district court improperly denied her a hearing before granting summary judgment and before denying reconsideration. We affirm. 3 The district court properly granted summary judgment against Hanson's Title VII and FEHA claims…