Lorenz v. Beltio, Ltd.

Good Law
76 F.3d 387·1996 WL 2210·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7331
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 3, 199694-15959California1,670 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Allen LORENZ; Sandra Lorenz; Allen Lorenz, Trustee of the Emma Gunderson Trust; Elaine Loverso, Trustee of the Don and Carmelina LoVerso Family Trust Appellants, v. BELTIO, LTD., Appellee. No. 94-15959. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1995. Decided Jan. 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, CANBY and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants Allen Lorenz, Sandra Lorenz, the Emma Gunderson Trust, and the Don and Carmelina LoVerso Family Trust appeal the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's decision to deny relief from the automatic stay and to void a state-issued writ of restitution. 3 We affirm in part and remand in part to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. I. 4 The bankruptcy court in this matter lifted the automatic stay for the purpose of allowing the state court to determine Beltio, Ltd.'s interest in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.