Louis Lampe Julia Lampe v. Anderson News Corp. Charlie Anderson, Jr., CEO

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis LAMPE; Julia Lampe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ANDERSON NEWS CORP.; Charlie Anderson, Jr., Ceo, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16608. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1995. Decided Feb. 9, 1996. Before: BROWNING, CANBY, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Louis Lampe, who had suffered two back injuries, was terminated from his job with Anderson News Corporation ("Anderson"). Lampe sued Anderson under a variety of theories. The district court entered summary judgment for Anderson. Lampe appeals on two grounds. First, Lampe argues that under the Americans with Disabilities Act he is a "qualified individual with a disability" and as such is entitled to "reasonable accommodations" on the part of Anderson. Second, Lampe contends that Anderson committed the tort of wrongful discharge because Anderson terminated Lampe in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation…