Timothy L. Malumphy v. Melvin Thomas, Deputy Warden, in His Personal and Official Capacity

Good Law
76 F.3d 387·1996 WL 30257·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199695-15953California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Timothy L. MALUMPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melvin THOMAS, Deputy Warden, in his personal and official capacity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15953. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Timothy Malumphy, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Melvin Thomas in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . After a de novo review of the district court record, see Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court opinion filed April 19, 1995. 3 To the extent that Malumphy appeals the denial of his motion to compel production of documents, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that the documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.