Jack Kinsey v. Robert Borg, Warden

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack KINSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-16080. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack Eugene Kinsey, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Kinsey claims that he was subjected to consecutive sentences that were not authorized by state law, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and review de novo. Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm. 3 Kinsey pleaded guilty to forcible oral copulation, penetration with a foreign object, and rape in violation of Cal. Penal Code §§ 288a(c), 289(a) and 261(2). Kinsey was sentenced, pursuant to Cal.…