Fredys Armando Larios v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
76 F.3d 387·1996 WL 39978·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7311
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199695-70375California1,763 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fredys Armando LARIOS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 1, 1995. * Decided Jan. 31, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** Introduction 2 Fredys Armando Larios petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We deny the petition. Factual and Procedural Background 3 Larios is a twenty-four year old single male who was born in Nicaragua and is a citizen of that country. Larios entered the United States without inspection at San Ysidro, California on January 11, 1989. On March 9, 1993, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") issued an order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.