Reynaldo Nevarez-Leyva, Jr. v. B. Farris B. Streeter K. Gabaldon T.D. Simpson W. Vaughn R. Talbot

76 F.3d 387 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Reynaldo NEVAREZ-LEYVA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. FARRIS; B. Streeter; K. Gabaldon; T.D. Simpson; W. Vaughn; R. Talbot, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Reynaldo Nevarez-Leyva, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against California state prison officials. In his complaint, Nevarez-Leyva alleged that the defendants violated his due process rights because they placed him in administrative segregation and revoked 360 days of good time credit without holding a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim, see Buckey v. County of Los Angeles, 968 F.2d 791,…