Prows v. Delaney

76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell PROWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom DELANEY; J.D. Swinson, Jr.; R.J. Lanphear; C. Casterline; Mr. Pendleton; Jane Haschmeyer; C. Chalmers; D. Ortiz; Mr. Grossman; M. John Houtori; R. Eisenbaugh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16621. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 30, 1996. Before: LAY, ** CHOY, PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Former federal prisoner Darrell Prows appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In his complaint, Prows alleged that numerous federal employees conspired to retaliate against him for his activities as a jailhouse lawyer. The district court dismissed Prows' complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 for failure to follow the district court's order to file an amended complaint that met the heightened pleading…