United States v. Edward Eugene Allen, United States of America v. Edward Eugene Allen

Good Law
76 F.3d 388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 199694-30391California920 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Eugene ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Eugene ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30391, 94-30392. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Jan. 9, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Eugene Allen appeals the district court's revocation of his probation and concurrent sentences of five years, appeal no. 94-30391, and two years, appeal no. 94-30392. Allen contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation because the term of probation had expired and the district court improperly considered charges adjudicated after the expiration of his term of probation. In appeal no. 94-30392, Allen also contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate him on the underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.