Mark Anthony Rea v. Jim Thomas, Warden Jeff Hood, Deputy Warden

76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Anthony REA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim THOMAS, Warden; Jeff Hood, Deputy Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15145. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 1, 1995. * Decided Jan. 24, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Anthony Rea, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Rea contends that the district court erred in holding that: (1) the defendants did not violate Rea's due process rights; and (2) the defendants were not deliberately indifferent to Rea's medical needs. We affirm. 3 * In analyzing claims alleging deprivation of procedural due process, courts must first determine whether the claimant has been deprived of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest. Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1419 (9th…