Lisa Ritzert-Smith v. Siemens Nuclear Power Corporation and Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation

76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lisa RITZERT-SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION; and Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: WRIGHT, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ritzert-Smith, a female employee of Siemens, alleged that she was paid less than her coworkers for equal work in violation of the Equal Pay Act, that she was subjected to a hostile work environment in violation of the Washington Law Against Discrimination, and that the company retaliated against her for filing this action. The district court granted summary judgment to Siemens and we review de novo. We affirm. I. Equal Pay 3 Ritzert-Smith argues that Siemens violated the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206 (d)(1), by paying her less than three of her male coworkers. She has made a prima facie…