Schuett v. Brown
Opinion
Opinion
76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert SCHUETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs; Robert E. Lindsey, Jr.; Paul J. McCool; William Eberle; Martin Sjursen; Jill Powers; James Powell; Kathy Mousorino; Linda Hill; Cruz Arvayo; Linda M. McAllister; Larry Boykin; Pat Ramirez; Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert B. Schuett appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Schuett's action alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 -796i. The district court found that Schuett's action was barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We…