Richard Terflinger v. James Rowland

76 F.3d 388 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard TERFLINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16667. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. * Decided Jan. 24, 1996. 1 Before: ALDISERT, SCHROEDER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges ** . 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 We affirm the decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendants. 4 * Mr. Terflinger argues that Folsom prison authorities violated his due process rights by: 1) failing to give him proper notice of the charges against him before his April 6, 1979 ICC hearing that reviewed his placement into administrative segregation, 2) relying on information proven to be false as justification for this placement, and 3) failing to assign an investigative employee to research Terflinger's case before placing him in administrative segregation. Terflinger, however, has apparently failed to name any Folsom prison employees as defendants or show…