United States v. Jesse Lee Banks

76 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse Lee BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1995. Decided Jan. 30, 1996. Before: HUG, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jesse Lee Banks was convicted after a jury trial of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) and (d), and use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). He appeals both his conviction and his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. I. 3 Banks' first contention is that the district court erred when it prevented him from presenting alibi witnesses at trial because he failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.1. Banks also argues that the court erred…