United States v. John Camacho, Jr.

76 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John CAMACHO, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-15560. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Camacho, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas motion to vacate his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, United States v. Frazer, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm on the grounds that Camacho's second 2255 motion constitutes an abuse of the writ. 1 3 Camacho's contention that his confession was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights was resolved against him by this Court in his direct criminal appeal. United States v. Camacho, Jr., No. 90-10024 (9th Cir. Feb. 26, 1991). Accordingly, Camacho cannot use this…