United States v. Jose Concepcion Garcia, United States of America v. Jose Concepcion Garcia

76 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Concepcion GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Concepcion GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-35752, 94-35754. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Concepcion Garcia appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as an abuse of the writ. Garcia contends that the district court gave an erroneous jury instruction on entrapment and impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to Garcia to show entrapment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Campbell v. Blodgett, 997 F.2d 512, 516 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1337 (1994), and affirm. 3 A petitioner abuses the writ of habeas corpus…