United States v. Billy T. Langston

76 F.3d 389 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy T. LANGSTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50519. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1995. Decided Jan. 31, 1996. Amended March 4, 1996. Before: HUG, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Billy T. Langston appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to aid and abet the manufacture of PCP and aiding and abetting the manufacture of PCP. Langston claims the district court improperly admitted evidence and that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. He also claims the district court erred in failing to adjust his sentence downward. We affirm. 3 * The district court properly found the search of the van lawful. Morganfield, who was driving the van, consented to the search. The district court found the consent voluntary. The determination that a defendant voluntarily consented to a…