Vontz & Sons, a Partnership v. American Agrisurance, Inc. Star Insurance Co.

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. VONTZ & SONS, a partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AGRISURANCE, INC.; Star Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15877. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 13, 1995. Decided Jan. 30, 1996. 1 Before: WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and REAL, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Vontz & Sons ("Vontz") appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of American Agrisurance, Inc. and Star Insurance Company ("Insurers"), arguing that genuine issues of material fact exist concerning its claims that Insurers improperly denied preventable planting endorsements ("PPE") for 1991 and 1992 cotton crops, and that Insurers failed fully to indemnify Vontz for 1991 crop losses. We affirm. 4 Vontz failed to establish any right to PPE coverage under the multiple peril crop policy in effect at the time of Vontz's request for PPE coverage. Vontz's…