United States v. Suen Man Tang Ren Hai

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suen Man TANG; Ren Hai, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-10036, 92-10037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1993. Submission Vacated Oct. 19, 1993. Resubmitted Jan. 31, 1996. Decided Feb. 2, 1996. Before: FARRIS, POOLE and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Suen Man Tang and Ren Hai appeal on various grounds their convictions of: conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and using or carrying a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). 3 AFFIRMED in part. REVERSED and REMANDED in part. I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 4 Tang and Hai argue that the government failed to present sufficient evidence to rebut their entrapment defense. To do this, the government must prove predisposition beyond a…