United States of America, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Mark Thierman, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Amino Discounters, Inc., Mark Thierman, United States of America v. Mark Thierman

Good Law
76 F.3d 390·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7411
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 199694-10279California6,583 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Mark THIERMAN, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMINO DISCOUNTERS, INC., Mark Thierman, et al., Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark THIERMAN, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-10279, 94-10293, 94-10307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 17, 1995. Filed Nov. 13, 1995. Amended Jan. 18, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, * District Judge. ORDER 2 With the filing of the amended memorandum, the panel votes unanimously to deny both petitions for rehearing in this matter. 3 Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, * District Judge. 4 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ** 5 Mark Thierman appeals his convictions under the FFDCA for one count of misbranding drugs with the intent to defraud or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.