Darrell Vincent White v. F. Earl Bandy Madera County and Madera County Board of Supervisors

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell Vincent WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F. Earl BANDY; Madera County and Madera County Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15769. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Darrell Vincent White appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Earl Bandy, a Madera County Superior Court research attorney, and the Madera County Board of Supervisors ("Board") in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. White alleged that Bandy and the Board conspired to deprive White of his right of access to the courts by causing the delay and denial of his state court actions. We review the district court's summary judgment de novo. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3…