United States v. Rohitesh Prasad, AKA Junior AKA Raj Kumar AKA Roger

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rohitesh PRASAD, aka Junior aka Raj Kumar aka Roger, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rohitesh Prasad appeals his 48-month sentence following resentencing by the district court. Prasad contends that the district court failed to: (a) apply correctly U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3; and (b) consider whether his sentence should have been further reduced for substantial assistance to the government pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and review de novo the district court's interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Ogbuehi, 18 F.3d 807, 814 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand. 3 In the Western District of…