United States v. Jose Antonio Santiago, AKA Leonardo Gomez Hernandez

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio SANTIAGO, aka Leonardo Gomez Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50190. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1996. * Decided Jan. 17, 1996. Before: SNEED, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Antonio Santiago, aka Leonardo Gomez Hernandez ("Gomez"), appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion and motion for reconsideration. We review de novo. United States v. Mills, 991 F.2d 609, 612 (9th Cir.1993). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In 1985, Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") agents investigating money laundering and drug activity, posed as money launderers and received $660,000, $539,200 and $918,626 from Gomez and his associates. The agents transferred the money to foreign bank accounts and received a fee for this service. As a…