United States v. Conley Winslow

Good Law
76 F.3d 390·1995 WL 792050·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40950
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 199595-10065California1,266 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Conley WINSLOW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Conley Winslow appeals his conviction following entry of a conditional guilty plea, to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Winslow contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because police officers lacked: (1) reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle and detain him; and (2) probable cause to search the locked trunk of the vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.