United States v. Real Property Rialto Acres Located in Fontana, California, Including Any Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Thereon v. Rancho Sierra Corporation Victor Portillo, Claimants-Appellants v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Claimant-Appellee. United States of America v. Real Property Vacant Land, Located Between Mango Streets and Sierra Avenue in Fontana, California, and Rancho Sierra Corporation, Claimant-Appellant

Good Law
76 F.3d 390·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 199694-56249California515 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 390 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY RIALTO ACRES LOCATED IN FONTANA, CALIFORNIA, including any Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements thereon, Defendant, v. RANCHO SIERRA CORPORATION; Victor Portillo, Claimants-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Claimant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY VACANT LAND, LOCATED BETWEEN MANGO STREETS AND SIERRA AVENUE IN FONTANA, CALIFORNIA, Defendant, and Rancho Sierra Corporation, Claimant-Appellant. Nos. 94-56249, 94-56261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1995. Decided Jan. 18, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This is an appeal from an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 striking claimants' answers in three civil forfeiture proceedings and entering a default judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.