Zerega v. City of Monterey Park

76 F.3d 391 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank ZEREGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, a municipal corporation organized under the Laws of the State of California; Unknown Daniel Cross, Chief of Police; Unknown Poore, Police Officer; Unknown Torres, Police Officer; Unknown Fuhman, Police Officer; J & M Towing Services, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 26, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We affirm the district court's dismissal with prejudice of Frank Zerega's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in light of Zerega's failure to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed by the district court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 321 (1992). 3 Because Zerega's appeal is frivolous, we grant the City of Monterey Park's motion for attorneys'…