Wynn v. McManus

Good Law
76 F.3d 391·1996 WL 32110·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7174
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 199695-35466California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 391 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randall WYNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert McMANUS, Sheriff at Lane County; Benjamin Sunderland, Captain in charge of the Lane County Sheriff's Department; Lane County Adult Correctional Facility; Lane County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35466. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 26, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randall Wynn, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an infringement of his free exercise of religion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992). 4 Wynn contends that the district court erred by concluding that he had failed to establish that defendants substantially burdened the free…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.