Vernon L. Williams v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

76 F.3d 391 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vernon L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF NEVADA; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55318. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 26, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Vernon L. Williams appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his first amended complaint in his action, styled as an independent action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), against the United States District Court for the District of Nevada and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit alleging fraud and denial of due process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. In his first amended complaint Williams alleged that "fraud was committed upon the court" in connection with a series of actions he brought against the Nevada…