Intel Corporation v. Commissioner

Good Law
76 F.3d 976
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 199694-70105California6,117 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 976 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1495 INTEL CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 94-70105, 94-70158. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 15, 1995. Decided Oct. 16, 1995. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Feb. 9, 1996. Wayne S. Kaplan, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, argued the cause. With him on brief were Joel V. Williamson, Roger J. Jones, and Patricia Anne Flaming, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Illinois, and James P. Fuller and Catherine L. Curtiss, Fenwick & West, Palo Alto, California, for petitioner-appellee-cross-appellant. Frank P. Cihlar, Gary R. Allen, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent-appellant-cross-appellee. On Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court. Before: SNEED, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 The Commissioner of Internal Revenue sought recovery of taxes from Intel Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries ("Intel") for the years 1978 through 1980 in the respective amounts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.