96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1006, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1678 Stephanie G. Pierce v. Multnomah County, Oregon City of Portland, Oregon Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Steve Duncan Janet Bowdle And, George Karcher

Good Law
76 F.3d 1032
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 199693-35405California6,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

76 F.3d 1032 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1006 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1678 Stephanie G. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON; City of Portland, Oregon; Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon; Steve Duncan; Janet Bowdle; and, George Karcher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35405. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1994. Decided Feb. 14, 1996. Stephanie G. Pierce, Pro Se, Portland, Oregon, for plaintiff-appellant. Gerald H. Itkin, Multnomah County Counsel, Portland, Oregon; Harry Auerbach, Deputy City Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, George E. Juba, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 Pro se 1 plaintiff Stephanie Pierce appeals an adverse judgment following a jury trial in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiff sued the City of Portland ("City"), Multnomah County ("County"), the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon ("Tri-Met"), fare inspector Jackson, corrections officers Bowdle and Karcher, and police officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.