Romeo Aguilon-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
77 F.3d 488·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8045
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 199695-70103California812 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 488 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Romeo AGUILON-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 12, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Romeo Aguilon-Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the order of an immigration judge ("IJ"), denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) and we grant the petition for review. 3 We review the factual findings regarding an applicant's eligibility for asylum under the substantial evidence standard. See Shirazi-Parsa v. INS, 14 F.3d 1424, 1427 (9th Cir.1994).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.