John E. Brady v. Glen E. Robinson, U.S. Marshal

77 F.3d 488 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John E. BRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glen E. ROBINSON, U.S. Marshal, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16578. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. Decided Feb. 20, 1996. 1 Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. 3 Appellant John E. Brady filed a Bivens action against appellees Glen E. Robinson and Reginald E. Boyd, claiming that appellees illegally refused to re-deputize Brady, thereby making him unable to work as a Court Security Officer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. Brady appeals the summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. II. 4 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995). The court must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any…