Bander v. City of Kirkland

Good Law
77 F.3d 488·1996 WL 64815·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8032
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 199695-35131California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 488 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jonathan S. BANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF KIRKLAND; Stewart Estes; Jane Doe Estes, and the marital community composed thereof; Keating, Bucklin & McCormack; John Doe; Jane Doe, 1-4, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. * Decided Feb. 12, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jonathan S. Bander appeals pro se the district court's denial of his voluntary motion to dismiss without prejudice brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). In this federal action, Bander alleged discrimination on the basis of disability in light of defendants' refusal to supply pleadings and court documents in large-size type in an unrelated state-court action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 3 All pending motions are denied. 4 AFFIRMED. *…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.