In re MacIntyre

Good Law
77 F.3d 489·1996 WL 65293·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8060
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 199695-55619California1,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 489 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Ronald C. MacINTYRE; Mary M. Pikus, Debtors. PHILIP A. DeMASSA, APC; Philip A. DeMassa, Appellants, v. Lyle BUTLER; Ronald C. MacIntyre; Mary M. Pikus; Prudential California Realty, Appellees. No. 95-55619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 14, 1996. 1 Before: ALARCON and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Attorney Philip A. DeMassa and his professional corporation, Philip A. DeMassa, APC, appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) imposing $250 in sanctions against him for blatant violation of the BAP rules concerning typesize in briefs. DeMassa contends that sanctions aren't appropriate under the facts of this case, and even if they are, the BAP failed to afford him the necessary due process before imposing them. DeMassa also asks that we order the BAP to "depublish" its opinion in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.