Donald D. Nicolaysen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a National Bank Association, Donald D. Nicolaysen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association Committee of Outside Growers

Good Law
77 F.3d 489·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8029
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 199694-15722California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

77 F.3d 489 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald D. NICOLAYSEN, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national bank association, Appellee. Donald D. NICOLAYSEN, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national banking association; Committee of Outside Growers, Appellees. Nos. 94-15722, 94-15757. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1995. Decided Feb. 6, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY ** , District Court Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Donald D. Nicolaysen appeals the district court's dismissal of his appeal from the bankruptcy court because of mootness. 4 This court reviews questions of mootness de novo. Native Village of Noatak the Blatchford, 38 F.3d 1505, 1509 (9th Cir.1994). Under general mootness principles, the lack of a stay may render an appeal moot if it becomes impossible to fashion effective relief. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dunning-Ray Ins. Agency, Inc., 66 B.R. 109, 113 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.